TechnologyApril 19, 20216 min read

Launching the Two Sigma Ventures Open Source Index

Originally published on the Two Sigma Ventures blog.

At Two Sigma Ventures, we are strong believers in the power of open source software. As part of Two Sigma, we’re lucky to have nearly 1000 software engineers (200+ with computer science-related PhDs) in our broader organization, many of whom actively use open source software in their daily work and contribute back to a variety of projects. Two Sigma is the creator of a number of popular open source projects, including BeakerX and Flint, and our colleagues include some of the original creators of Apache Arrow and Pandas. Suffice to say, we live and breathe open source.

For several years now we have been following the rise of open source software in the startup ecosystem, and Two Sigma Ventures has invested in several companies that leverage an open core business model or publish open source libraries. These include companies like Timescale, NS1, Radar Labs, GitLab, and one of our most recent investments, Replicated. We are excited about these businesses for a variety of reasons. We have seen firsthand how software created by developers, for developers, leveraging community-based development, can lead to incredible innovation. Moreover, we are excited about how enterprise software is moving towards bottoms-up adoption, and how an open core business can lead to remarkably efficient customer acquisition and growth.

In that vein, we are excited to launch the Two Sigma Ventures Open Source Index to showcase what we consider the most popular and fastest growing open source projects in the world, which you can see in its entirety here for the first time today. We hope that the data we publish here, which will be updated regularly, will provide insights for many different types of people in the tech ecosystem – from entrepreneurs, to developers, to anyone interested in studying high-level trends. Eventually, we plan to add additional pieces of data for each project and allow for more granular filtering and searching and in the coming months we will be publishing more insights and analysis. And in the spirit of the open source movement, we would love to share the raw data with you if you are interested in playing around with it. If you have any suggestions on how we can improve the Index, please don’t hesitate to reach out. And finally, if you’re building a commercial open source business, we couldn’t be more excited to hear your story!

Our Methodology:

We started by using the GitHub API to download all publicly available data on the top GitHub projects ranked by number of “Watchers.” Most other lists that rank open source projects use Stars as their “north star” metric, no pun intended. However, we believe that over time, GitHub Stars has become a vanity metric that is often gamed and that Watchers is instead a more telling signal of ongoing interest in a project. When a user elects to “Watch” a project on GitHub, they receive notifications about the project and its relevant discussions. When users are no longer interested in a project, they often will un-Watch that repository. Therefore, we believe that Watchers are a more interesting signal of sustained project popularity than Stars. Additionally, using license information and through manual sorting, we filtered out non-technical projects, such as books, lists, and educational content.

Our Index ranks projects using what we call the “TSV Score.” The score is a weighted average of the variables listed below, which we normalized to fit our scale of 0 to 100. The weights we chose are listed in parentheses.

We understand that these weights are arbitrary and reflect just one perspective on what’s important in building a great open source community. We’d love to share the raw data with you and have you play around with various weights and other data sources. Let us know if you’d like a copy!

Key Insights:

While we’ll be sharing more in the coming months, our first iteration of the Index has revealed to us a number of fascinating, data-driven insights about the state of software today. See below for our initial findings, and we hope you will slice and dice the data and share any learnings back with us.

← Back to all essays